<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Squaring the Circle - Pt. 1.5</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.arslatomorum.com/publish/squaring-the-circle-pt-iv/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.arslatomorum.com/publish/squaring-the-circle-pt-iv/</link>
	<description>The Manic Magniloquence of a Masonic Madman</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 16:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: J.</title>
		<link>http://www.arslatomorum.com/publish/squaring-the-circle-pt-iv/#comment-203</link>
		<dc:creator>J.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 21:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamitch.merseine.nu/publish/httpjamitchmerseinenupublishsquaring-the-circle-pt-iv/#comment-203</guid>
		<description>You aren't the first. I've had many people look at me cross-eye when I suggest the monad as an inspiration, or a predecessor of the Point-Within-A-Circle. I think, people avoid the monad because the solution appears to easy, or exclude the monad preferring to find (or invent) an ancient application with the two perpendicular lines - as if the easy answer is always wrong or suspect, or that syncretisticity is inherently bad, and avoided.

As the neo-plantonic school is inherently mathematic and mystic, as it posits geometry at the top of its art, and as many of the supposed ancient patrons of Masonry - specifically Pythagoras (Pyther Gower for all you English Brothers), I see the monad as easily fitting into operative and speculative Craft Masonry.

Others disagree...

J.

P.S. I like this theme as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You aren&#8217;t the first. I&#8217;ve had many people look at me cross-eye when I suggest the monad as an inspiration, or a predecessor of the Point-Within-A-Circle. I think, people avoid the monad because the solution appears to easy, or exclude the monad preferring to find (or invent) an ancient application with the two perpendicular lines - as if the easy answer is always wrong or suspect, or that syncretisticity is inherently bad, and avoided.</p>
<p>As the neo-plantonic school is inherently mathematic and mystic, as it posits geometry at the top of its art, and as many of the supposed ancient patrons of Masonry - specifically Pythagoras (Pyther Gower for all you English Brothers), I see the monad as easily fitting into operative and speculative Craft Masonry.</p>
<p>Others disagree&#8230;</p>
<p>J.</p>
<p>P.S. I like this theme as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.arslatomorum.com/publish/squaring-the-circle-pt-iv/#comment-202</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 20:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamitch.merseine.nu/publish/httpjamitchmerseinenupublishsquaring-the-circle-pt-iv/#comment-202</guid>
		<description>First, this is my favorite theme so far.

I am amazed that with the research I have done into Islamic neoplatonism and emanationism, I have never connected the monad and the Craft.  

A neoplatonist I am writing on now, Abu Ya`qub al-Sijistani, had his own interpretation of the monad.  Intellect is the originator of being, from intellect originates seven categories:  temporal eternity, truth, happiness, demonstration, life, perfection, and self subsistence.  It's interesting stuff.  No time or room here to elaborate upon it I'm afraid.  It may make for a good educational at some point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, this is my favorite theme so far.</p>
<p>I am amazed that with the research I have done into Islamic neoplatonism and emanationism, I have never connected the monad and the Craft.  </p>
<p>A neoplatonist I am writing on now, Abu Ya`qub al-Sijistani, had his own interpretation of the monad.  Intellect is the originator of being, from intellect originates seven categories:  temporal eternity, truth, happiness, demonstration, life, perfection, and self subsistence.  It&#8217;s interesting stuff.  No time or room here to elaborate upon it I&#8217;m afraid.  It may make for a good educational at some point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
